Thank you for this adequate response to the Trump nonsense. There is a great need for responses like this, instead of going along with the Trump framing.
You're wasting your breath and I can guarantee that nobody in his DOD even thought of telling NATO because what would be the point. NATO can only come to the defence of a nation being attacked. Iran wasn't attacking the USA ergo the US were the aggressor! Though I do wish they'd allow Ukraine into that PACT because it's obvious that Russia would butt out if that were the case. This is what NATO's role is. To help keep the peace not to allow puffed up leaders to commit war crimes. Thanks for the rundown regarding the agreement. I'll save it.
Trying to offer a rational, evidence-based, rooted in the treaty text, point by point rebuttal of incoherent nonsense is a noble enterprise but also, sadly, a fool's errand in the end. Like trying to graph the contents of a blender smoothed into sewage slop. Gold star for the effort though.
That was informative
I must admit I'm a bit disappointed (maybe a lot 😆 )that the President of the United States is not aware of these resolutions in the UN charter LOL
Thank you for this adequate response to the Trump nonsense. There is a great need for responses like this, instead of going along with the Trump framing.
You're wasting your breath and I can guarantee that nobody in his DOD even thought of telling NATO because what would be the point. NATO can only come to the defence of a nation being attacked. Iran wasn't attacking the USA ergo the US were the aggressor! Though I do wish they'd allow Ukraine into that PACT because it's obvious that Russia would butt out if that were the case. This is what NATO's role is. To help keep the peace not to allow puffed up leaders to commit war crimes. Thanks for the rundown regarding the agreement. I'll save it.
Excellent! Thanks for writing; most informative .Unfortunately the President doesn’t read.
Preach!!💪🏽
Trying to offer a rational, evidence-based, rooted in the treaty text, point by point rebuttal of incoherent nonsense is a noble enterprise but also, sadly, a fool's errand in the end. Like trying to graph the contents of a blender smoothed into sewage slop. Gold star for the effort though.